Google iPhone App Hits App Store, and Gruber Comments
Gruber:
An interesting app for a service I do not enjoy. It does not solve my fundamental problem with Google+, which is that it feels like work to use.
Google’s iOS mobile team has developed their own UI idioms for their iOS apps. Part of that is their own visual aesthetic, but there’s more to it than how it looks. It’s certainly not Android-like, but it’s not iOS-like either. For example, this Google+ app uses left-right swiping to change views in your “Stream”. I see three: Incoming, Circles, and Nearby. The idiomatic iOS design for this would be a tab controller at the bottom with three tabs, one for each view. Google+ has a thin header at the top of the view, showing all three, with the current view in the middle, in a slightly larger font size. To switch from, say, Circles to Nearby, you swipe left. But you can keep swiping left, left, left to cycle around, like a carousel.
I’m not going to argue that this sort of UI experimentation is wrong. It’s just that in this case, I don’t like it personally. Compare and contrast with, say, apps like Twitterrific and Tweetbot. Both those apps use custom controls and sound effects, but their customization is mostly aesthetic. At a wireframe level, both Twitterrific and Tapbots follow common iOS design patterns: you tap to change views, you swipe to move content within the current view.
The Google+ app feels like it was designed by people who don’t like the standard iPhone design idioms. And stuff like the button order here is just plain awful. Update: Bizarrely, the app doesn’t work on the iPod Touch; only iPhone 3G, 3GS, and 4.
A preview of Gmail’s new (boring???) look - Official Gmail Blog
Zzzzzz….. At the surface level, the new GMAIL theme/look, looks, well, “meh.” Actually, reminds me of something that has a Microsoft look and feel. Boring might be too strong of a word. Maybe opinions will change once we get in there and actually use it.
Joshua Gans: Google+ Comes Up Short
Joshua Gans on Google+
What problem does Google+ solve for consumers? The answer appears to be: nothing. And, therefore, it solves nothing for Google either.
Google Swiffy
Convert Flash to HTML5. Clever.
XKCD on Google
Google’s version of Facebook. The next Google Wave?
PayPal Files Lawsuit Over Google Wallet
I’m all for a ‘mobile wallet’ - and one that’s done right, easy to use and widely accepted!
Betting Google settles this one, fast.
We spend a lot of time and energy creating the things that make PayPal unique and a preferred way to pay for almost 100 million people around the world. We treat PayPal’s “secrets” seriously, and take it personally when someone else doesn’t. So we made a decision today. We filed a lawsuit against Google and two former colleagues who now work there, Osama Bedier and Stephanie Tilenius.
What Are They Selling?
Rene Ritchie is not a fan of Google’s new “Dear Sophie” ad: Apple’s latest ad wants you to buy a $500+ tablet computer to run App Store apps on. Apple wants to sell you shiny things to make money. Google’s latest ad wants you to store personal details about your child’s life, from birth, on their servers. Google wants your data so they can sell it (aggregated and anonymized, of course) to others to make money. Taken in that context, Apple’s ad might be obnoxious and highly commercial, but Google’s is downright creepy.
LOL! Biggest Threat to Apple: Google Chrome OS
Don’t think I’ll be eating my words any time soon with this post’s subject. I literally had water come through my nose when I read the subject line from Anton Wahlman.
This is primarily why Cloud Computing has a ways to go, especially when Google is concerned. Google provides some of the worlds best “Cloud Devices,” i.e., GMail, Calendar, Docs, etc., yet, provides such sucky minimal support.
Take a simple example from Twitter. Why not have a status.google.com so that users don’t need to rush to Google Groups to alert officials that some of us are experiencing difficulty with our Google Calendars?! Simple concept. Tough to execute? Probably not.


